In the market of optics, Nikon is a significant powerhouse. They have produced optics for just about anything, not only cameras and lenses but also weapon scopes. And the product quality is great. So, in this article, we are going to discuss the differences between two high-quality Nikon scopes, Nikon Buckmaster II vs ProStaff. Which one is actually better?
Continue reading below to learn more about:
– The available models in the Buckmaster II and ProStaff lines
– The available features on each weapon scope
– The build quality and durability of each model
– The performance of Nikon Buckmaster II vs ProStaff
– Which weapon scope model that is generally more recommended
The Buckmaster II and theProStaff lines are a proof of Nikon’s effort to make weapon scopes available at just about every price level. In general, both lines here are mid-range optics. However, the Buckmaster II scopes are usually cheaper than the ProStaff models. See also: Zeiss Terra ED 10×42 vs Nikon Monarch 7.
Both lines have multiple scopes with different magnification ranges. However, the options on Nikon Buckmaster II are more limited than Nikon ProStaff. In addition, it is interesting that the two lines don’t share any magnification range in common.
The current line of Nikon Buckmaster II offers two magnification ranges, which are 3-9x and 4-12x. On the other hand, Nikon ProStaff has three magnification ranges, including 2.5-10x, 3.5-14x, and 4.5-18x. As you can see, not only the ProStaff line offers more choices, but also every scope in the line has a wider range from the lowest to the higher magnification. It makes the scope more versatile and adaptable to different situations.
Turrets and Parallax Adjustment
The next difference between Nikon Buckmaster II vs ProStaff is the turrets. Well, they are similar that both models use hand-turned turrets. Both can also be reset to zero for quick field adjustments and easy wind/elevation calls. But the adjustments are different.
Nikon Buckmaster II uses ¼-inch adjustments at 100 yards. The settings are perfectly suitable for casual shooting. It is also usable and effective for hunting. However, it is uncommonly used for professional long-range shooting.
Nikon Buckmaster II does not have any parallax adjustment. As the effect, it is not adaptable for close range shooting. The lack of this feature may be a drawback if you need to prepare against potential threats in close-quarter, but not if you always shoot from a distance.
On the other hand, Nikon ProStaff uses MOA adjustments with ¼’ MOA per click. The settings are especially suitable for long-range precision shooting. MOA adjustments are widely used in rifle books, professional shooting, and various shooting styles.
Nikon ProStaff also comes with parallax adjustment. This feature allows you to adapt the scope to be used in close-quarter shooting. It is very useful if you perform not only long-range shooting and there is a potential risk of a close-quarter battle.
Eye Relief and Quick Focus
Nikon Buckmaster II and Nikon ProStaff both have good eye relief, although there is a slight difference. With a longer eye relief, you will be able to shoot with a more powerful caliber without accidentally getting hit by the recoil.
The eye relief of Nikon Buckmaster II is 3.6 inches. This distance is already perfect for many full-powered calibers, such as the .30-06 Springfield or the 7.62x51mm NATO. Such calibers are sufficient for hunting purposes. However, it may be unsuitable for the further calibers with very high power.
Nikon Buckmaster II does not have a quick-focus eyepiece. This means that you will need to take a little bit longer to aim precisely on your target. However, since the scope is mainly designed for hunting purposes, this is probably not a real problem.
The eye relief of Nikon ProStaff, on the other hand, is a little longer. It is 4 inches. The additional distance gives you access to the larger shooting calibers, such as the famous .338 Lapua Magnum used in Afghanistan and Iraq. Such calibers can penetrate through better-than-average body armor.
Nikon ProStaff features a quick-focus eyepiece. This feature is incredibly useful in competitive and tactical situations, as it allows you to aim on the target more quickly with good precision.
Both models have excellent durability. They have been tested rigorously for their toughness, and they have passed with highly positive marks. Both optics are waterproof, fogproof, and shockproof. They are nitrogen-purged and equipped with O-ring seals to prevent moisture, dust, and debris from coming in.
Both Nikon Buckmaster II and Nikon ProStaff come with the No-Fault Repair And Replacement Policy plus a limited lifetime warranty. If there is a defect or damage that is not warranted by the company, you can still send the scope back to be repaired or replaced by the policy. Meanwhile, the limited lifetime warranty ensures that the scope is always free from defects and normal wear and tear.
So, between Nikon Buckmaster II vs ProStaff, which one does have the better image quality and overall performance? As a matter of fact, they both perform very well. Nikon ProStaff wins, but only with relatively small advantages.
Inside 150 yards, you probably won’t notice much of a difference between the two. Both models can deliver outstanding performance for hunting. The images are very clear with accurate colors. You can easily spot a deer or hog in the field of view.
However, at 200 yards, the images provides by Nikon Buckmaster II are slightly less sharp. Nikon ProStaff can give sharper images and details with more vivid colors, especially when looking at a small object. You can recognize designs and patterns more easily. After all, the ProStaff comes with higher magnification levels, so it is better suited for such kind of shooting.
Nikon Buckmaster II Vs ProStaff
If you are looking for the best weapon scope available for the money, Nikon ProStaff should be your choice. This model offers higher magnification levels, and it comes with more advanced features such as the parallax adjustment and quick-focus eyepiece. The image quality is also better, with sharper details and more vivid colors, especially when looking at small, distant objects.